Ukraine and NATO: Partners Regardless of Barriers

  • Vitalii Omelchenko
  • 7.4.2021 22:20

In the eight years following Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, Kyiv looks to NATO as a key supporter and partner in countering Moscow’s expansionist policy. This cooperation faces several challenges but has a huge rationale and a potential to gain momentum.

Security across the European borderline has deteriorated dramatically in recent years. The security landscape is shaken by political turmoil and armed conflicts. International challenges, especially the coronavirus pandemic, add a layer of complexity over underlying geopolitical rivalries. Domestically, the European Union faces new challenges because of Brexit, and internal competition between member states.

With these developments in mind, NATO remains the cornerstone of Europe’s collective security architecture, cementing Euroatlantic unity. At the same time, asymmetric security threats and challenges that Ukraine faces and the inability to individually counter Russia’s aggression push Kyiv to rely on the international community, its support and assistance. In this context, NATO is considered as one of the major allies of Ukraine and the aspiration to join the Alliance remains popular both among the country’s elites and society at large. 


Obstacles to Full-fledged Membership

Ukraine cooperates with NATO fruitfully, and the country is fully committed to Euro-Atlantic integration, with the aspiration of Alliance membership enshrined in the Ukrainian Constitution and clearly indicated in its National Security Strategy. Nevertheless, imminent membership is not likely for several reasons.

Firstly, because there are pending Russian territorial claims over the country and an ongoing conflict with proxy Russian-backed forces. 

NATO is a collective security system and its primary goal is to decrease the cost of collective security among the member states while maximising deterrence. This is achieved through a shared responsibility to protect each other – the well-known Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty as well as through confidence in each state’s neighbours, which includes shared common values. Deterrence rests on the credible claim that member states will mobilise collectively in case of aggression against one member of the Alliance. Therefore, if Ukraine was to join NATO, the Alliance would face the choice between entering a conflict or risk discrediting its claim to collective defence. The potential enemy would be the Russian Federation, a country with powerful military forces and nuclear arsenals.

NATO members would have to choose between not protecting Ukraine, which would be the end of the principle “a threat to one is a threat to all,” or a full-scale war. NATO members would justifiably prefer to avoid the possibility of large-scale conflict.


“By far not all the NATO members share Ukraine’s perception of Russia as a direct threat to independence, territorial integrity and their very existence.”


The second reason is the different perception of Russia’s threat. By far not all the NATO members share Ukraine’s perception of Russia as a direct threat to independence, territorial integrity and their very existence. France and Germany, or members located far from Russia's borders have different visions of the security threats than the Baltic states for instance.  

Moreover, most influential NATO member states often consider relations with Ukraine through the prism of their relations with the Russian Federation, and NATO membership of Ukraine may be an instrument of affecting Moscow’s position in other important issues, for example, nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament. Furthermore, Russia is sometimes considered as a potential alternative to growing China’s power and influence. In this scenario additional escalation because of Ukraine’s membership in the Alliance is undesirable.

Last but not least, Ukraine is not a fully functioning democracy yet. There is no operational definition of how that benchmark is set, but at the very least it entails sharing common values, institutionally compatible decision-making processes, and a shared world view across a range of foreign policy and security issues. That includes trust in public administration, domestic stability, and social cohesion. Failing to pass these fundamental benchmarks would hurt NATO’s image as a stronghold of democracy and may cause political turbulence, social unrest or worsening interstate relations within NATO territory. This, in turn, may decrease the unity and credibility of the Organization as well as its attractiveness for aspiring states. There are already existing tensions among the NATO members, for instance between Greece, France and Turkey. For this reason, adding a new potential trouble spot remains undesirable.


Reasons for NATO to Deepen Cooperation with Ukraine

At the same time, there are several reasons for NATO to further support Ukraine and deepen cooperation with Kyiv. 

Firstly, Ukraine is located in a strategically important region, between the Atlantic and the Black Sea. The interest that influential actors show towards Eastern Europe proves, once again, that both nature and geopolitics detest vacuums. Apart from Moscow intensifying its military presence and political influence in the region, Russia and China are also positioning themselves economically, either through the Eurasian Economic Union or the Belt and Road Initiative and its regional incarnation as the  “17+1” initiative. China’s expansion does not as yet have a “String of Pearls” military component, as in the Indo-Pacific Region, but the more vital the interests the more security discourse comes to bear.  

NATO’s second interest is the Ukrainian army, experienced and battle-hardened, ready to share experience and to contribute to the Alliance. Existing formats of cooperation like Partnership for Peace, Enhanced Opportunities Partnership and other frameworks provide scope for further tactical inter-operability and coordination.


“The more conflicts in the post-Soviet space are entrenched, the longer their duration, the bigger the threat to collective European security and prosperity.”


Another important factor is regional security. Over the last two decades, the potential for conflict across Europe and its periphery is rising, to a great extent because of Russia's policy. The more conflicts in the post-Soviet space are entrenched, the longer their duration, the bigger the threat to collective European security and prosperity. 

In this context, the Ukrainian case is the most important since it is a rather boiling conflict than frozen, and escalation can occur anytime, especially paying attention to unpredictable behaviour of Russia’s puppets, the so-called Donetsk and Luhansk people’s republics. An escalation of conflict in the region would at the very least demand the increase of defence expenditures by NATO member states. Assisting Ukraine in defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity could in this sense be a forward looking investment.

Finally, the potential threat to the ideological credibility of democracy and the unity of the “democratic world” should not be taken for granted. Ukraine is not the only aspiring country that wants to join NATO, or the only one committed to democracy. Ukraine has proved that it is committed to reforms towards democracy but, if the country was to be abandoned to its own devices because of its geopolitical choice, NATO would lose its gravitational appeal in places over and beyond Ukraine. Such a scenario is even more dangerous paying attention to the existence of alternative systems of governance. China for example often offers enormous economic benefits, which many countries eagerly accept, without requiring difficult and long-lasting changes towards democratization.  


The Right Choice

Ukraine is still far from NATO membership. Russia's expansionist policy and its repercussions present obstacles that the country cannot simply bypass; and Kyiv must also complete its democratic transformation to remain on track for eventual membership.

However, the changing balance of power and growing geopolitical rivalry with contesting powers in the region suggest that shared values and interests are now more important.. Ukraine has made its choice, and the efforts Kyiv makes lay a solid foundation for deeper cooperation and future membership. Now NATO has to make the right choice and deepen its engagement with Ukraine, as both sides work towards a democratic order with collective security and prosperity.

About author: Vitalii Omelchenko


Tento web používá k analýze návštěvnosti soubory cookie. Používáním tohoto webu s tím souhlasíte. Další informace